Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- hulu_1920-an [2025/11/28 19:14] – [1927-05-13: Pembinaan Masjid Jenderam] sazli
+++ hulu_1920-an [2026/01/13 16:20] (kini) – [1929-09-02: Kes Ugut di Jenderam Estate] sazli
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
   * [[jenderam_hulu|Kampung Jenderam Hulu (1870-an)]]
+  * [[hulu_1910-an|Kampung Jenderam Hulu: 1910-an]]
+**SAMBUNGAN DARI: [[hulu_1910-an|Kampung Jenderam Hulu: 1910-an]]**.
 ====== Kronologi ======
@@ Line 13: / Line 16: @@
 ==== Peta 1926 dan 1929 ====
-{{:peta:peta-jenderam-1926.png?450|Peta sekitar rizab Melayu Jenderam, 1926}}{{:peta:peta-jenderam-1929.png?450|Peta sekitar rizab Melayu Jenderam, 1929}} \\
+{{:peta:peta-jenderam-1926.png?345|Peta sekitar rizab Melayu Jenderam, 1926}}{{:peta:peta-jenderam-1929.png?345|Peta sekitar rizab Melayu Jenderam, 1929}} \\
 **Kiri**: Peta sekitar rizab Melayu Jenderam (1926). Kawasan rizab melayu ini telah diperluaskan ke seluruh hulu Sungai Jenderam di sebelah selatannya (Malaya Survey Department, 1926 @ University of Minnesota Libraries: {{ :laman:umedia-peta-selangor-1926.pdf ||}}[[https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/item/p16022coll230:3899|"Selangor : Federated Malay States 1926"]]). \\
 **Kanan**: Peta sekitar rizab Melayu Jenderam (1929) (Edward Stanford @ F.M.S. Survey Department, 1929: {{ :laman:selangor_1929._geographicus_rare_antique_maps.pdf ||}}[[https://www.geographicus.com/P/AntiqueMap/selangor-fms-1929|"1929 F.M.S. Wall Map of Selangor (Kuala Lumpur)"]]).
@@ Line 54: / Line 57: @@
 Arkib Negara 1957/0233493W, 25/11/1924: {{ :arkibgambar:online_finding_aids_-_material_detail_-_267737.pdf ||}}[[https://ofa.arkib.gov.my/ofa/group/asset/267737|"APPLICATION FROM THE MALAYS RESIDING IN THE MALAY RESERVATION AT JENDRAM FOR A MOSQUE AND BURIAL GROUND. RESERVATION OF LAND :"]].
+**MAKLUMAT LANJUT: [[masjid_alridha|Masjid Al-Ridha (1936)]]**
 ===== 1925-03-18: Bangunan Sewaan Sekolah =====
@@ Line 70: / Line 74: @@
   * Arkib Negara 1957/0248259W, 13/05/1927: {{ :arkibgambar:online_finding_aids_-_material_detail_-_291801.pdf ||}}[[https://ofa.arkib.gov.my/ofa/collection/asset/291801|"APPLICATIONFOR A GOVERNMENT GRANT TOWARDS THE BUILDING OF A NEW MOSQUE AT JENDERAM, KAJANG"]].
-Menurut rekod JAKIM, bangunan asal masjid ini telah pun beroperasi sejak tahun 1936. Bangunan masjid yang ada kini telah dibina semula sepenuhnya pada tahun 1982: //"Tarikh Dibina: 01/01/1982 ..... Mengikut catatan dari kajian ole Mohd Nor bin Mohd Amin (kajian ilmiah Sarjana Muda Sastera Jabatan Sejarah Universiti Malaya 1977/78) Hj.Abdullah bin Husin. lahir di bandar Sumatera 1883 pernah ditauliahkan oleh Sultan Selangor sebagai ketua masjid kariah Jenderam pada tahun 1936. Namun dipercayai pembesaran masjid dikampung ini telah bermula lebih awal tahun lagi memandangkan pembukaan kampung ini telah dilakukan oleh Penghulu Naim bin Nak Oada tahun 1909/1910 yang datang dari Kuala Langat bersama - sama Kenton,Orang Tua Sayat dan 16 orang lagi dari Beranang."// (Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia @ Portal Masjid Malaysia: {{ :laman:portal_sismim_-_masjid_ridha_jenderam.pdf ||}}[[https://masjid.islam.gov.my/maklumatDetailMS/1/1007006|"MASJID AR RIDHA"]]).
+**MAKLUMAT LANJUT: [[masjid_alridha|Masjid Al-Ridha (1936)]]**
+===== 1927-1928: Kes Melibatkan Kaum Muda Madrasatul Ubudiah =====
+==== Latar Peristiwa ====
+//"Pada tahun 1927 kes dan isu Kaum Muda di Jenderam ini telah dibawa ke Mahkamah Syariah Klang dan juga ke Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur. Tuan Guru Hj. Jalaluddin Ismail, Hj. Abdullah Hussin dan beberapa pengajar dan pengikutnya yang mendirikan Madrasatul Ubudiah pada tahun 1922 sebagai pusat pengajian agama secara sistematik yang menggabungkan sukatan pengajian daripada Sumatera dan Mesir di Jenderam, telah didakwa di mahkamah oleh Pejabat Agama Selangor sebagai membawa fahaman dan pendekatan yang menyimpang dan bertentangan dengan Mazhab Shafie yang diamalkan di negeri ini. \\
+\\
+Kes ini asalnya diadukan oleh seorang ahli jemaah yang telah dipecat oleh Tuan Guru Jalaluddin atas sebab menyelewengkan wang tabung pentadbiran dan kebajikan kampung ini semasa ketiadaannya yang semasa itu pergi menunaikan ibadah Haji di Mekah. Akibat malu dan sakit hati bekas ahli jemaah itu membuat aduan kepada Pejabat Agama Selangor tentang fahaman reformis Kaum Muda di Madrasah itu. Namun penduduk Jenderam bersatu hati dan berdiri teguh mempertahankan tuan - tuan guru mereka dan Madrasatul Ubudiah atas tuduhan dan bersedia mempertahankan kebenaran dan hak mereka di Mahkamah. \\
+\\
+Perbicaraan yang bermula di Mahkamah Syariah Klang tidak dapat diselesaikan sepenuhnya, Putera Sultan Selangor dan Putera Sultan Langkat turut serta hadir dalam mendengar perbicaraan tersebut dan terlibat dalam memberi pandangan dalam kes ini. Kes yang tidak selesai itu kemudiannya telah dibawa pula ke Mahkamah Tinggi, Kuala Lumpur. Perbicaraan telah berlangsung selama 14 hari, ramai pendokong dan penyokong gerakan reformis Kaum Muda hadir termasuklah dari Singapura dan Pulau Pinang datang memberi sokongan moral dan kewangan kepada penduduk Jenderam. Peguam Tuan Malik telah mewakili Tuan Hj.Jalaluddin dan penduduk Jenderam manakala Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor diwakili oleh Tuan Evans. Setelah perbicaraan Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi memutuskan kes ini dibuang. Bagaimanapun Pejabat Penghulu Kajang telah meminta pemimpin - pemimpin Kaum Muda Jenderam memohon ampun pada Sultan Selangor walaupun mereka telah dibebaskan daripada kes dan tuduhan tersebut. \\
+\\
+Setelah perbicaraan ini Tuan Hj.Jalaluddin merasa tidak lagi tenteram tinggal di Jenderam apatah lagi tauliah mengajarnya  telah ditarik balik oleh Pejabat Agama Selangor. Dalam tahun yang sama beliau meninggalkan Jenderam dan merantau ke Pattani dan Madrasatul Ubudiah di teruskan oleh Tuan Guru Abdul Aziz Ahmad Khusasi dan Tuan Guru Pakeh Sempurna."//
+(Sumber: Faizal Zainal @ Facebook Selangor 10, 20 Julai 2020:  [[https://www.facebook.com/selangordarulehsan10/posts/pfbid02zta6ASW1eajpr5xFMuUPm7JEMGxRxomYGGi1vmZcxWiizjFZ1J4PPVqUsBVRHhmCl|"Catatan Subuh Hari : Faham Kaum Muda Jenderam"]]).
+==== 1928-07-14: Tuan Guru Haji Jalaluddin Mendakwa Difitnah ====
+//"The Kuala Lumpur Supreme Court was packed with Malays from all parts of the State on Tuesday. when an action was begun before the Chief Justice (Sir Henry Gompertz) in which Haji Jalaluddin Bin Ismail, a religious instructor, of Jendram, Ulu langat, brought an action against seven other Malays for publishing a libel against
+him. He claimed $3,250 as damages, and prayed for an injunction against the defendants restraining them from publishing similar libellous statements to that complained of. The plaintiff, who is a "guru," imparting
+religious instruction to the people of Sungei Jendram, alleges that on December 15th., 1927, the defendants and others presented a petition to the Chief Kathi of the State of Selangor, which set out inter alia: "In the village of Sungei Jendram at the present time have sprung up the doctrines of 'Quam Mudå,' who are otherwise called the sect of 'Wahabis.' Their teacher who has taught those doctrines is Tuan Guru Haji Jalaluddin, together with all his friends." It was also asserted that the plaintiff prayed without uttering the "Usalli," and prohibited teaching of Talqueen to the dead and the praising of the Sultan during the sermon of the Friday prayers - meaning therefore that he was preaching unorthodox and heretical doctrines and imparting teaching calculated to foster feelings of disloyalty to the Sultan. An inquiry into the complaint was held by the Chief Kathi of Selangor, and after evidence had been recorded the complaint against the plaintiff was dismissed. As a consequence of the libellous statements, the plaintiff declares that he has been virtually excommunicated and has lost many pupils. The defence pleads denial, truth and justification, and privilege."// (The Singapore Free Press and Mercantile Advertiser (1884-1942), 14 July 1928, Page 12: {{ :akhbar:singfreepressb19280714-1-2-76.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singfreepressb19280714-1.2.76|"MALAY LIBEL ACTION"]]).
+//"**Guru Claims Damages. Allegations of Heresy and Unorthodoxy.** \\
+\\
+The Kuala Lumpur Supreme Court was packed with Malays from all parts of the State on Wednesday, when an action was begun before the Chief Justice (Sir Henry Gompertz) in which Haji Jalaluddin Bin Ismail, a religious instructor, of Jendram, Uln Langat, brought an action against seven other Malays - Buyong alias Nicham, Haji Siam alias Haji Abdullah, Sura, Sarin, Kasat, Kahan and Mandok - for publishing a libel against him, says the Malay Mail. He claimed $3,250 as damages, and prayed for an injunction against the defendants restraining them from publishing similar libellous statements to that complained of. Mr. M. N. Maliik appeared for the plaintiff
+and Mr. F. B. Ivens for the defendants. The plaintiff, who is a "guru," imparting religious instruction to the
+people of Sungei Jendram, alleges that on Dec. 15, 1927. the defendants and others presented a petition to
+the Chief Kathi of the State of Selangor, which set out inter alia: "In the village of Sungei Jendram at the present time have sprung up the doctrines of 'Quam (Kaum) Muda,' who are otherwise called the sect of 'Wababis.' Their teacher who has taught those doctrines is Tuan Guru Haji Jalaluddin, together with all his friends." It was also asserted that the plaintiff prayed without uttering the "Usalli," and prohibited teaching of Talqueen to the dead and the praising of the Sultan during the sermon of the Friday prayers - meaning therefore that he was preaching unorthodox and heretical doctrines and imparting teaching calculated to foster
+feelings of disloyalty to the Sultan. An inquiry into the complaint was held by the Chief Kathi of Selangor, and after evidence had been recorded the complaint against the plaintiff was dismissed. As a consequence of the libellous statements, the plaintiff declares that he has been virtually excommunicated and has lost many pupils. The defence pleads denial, truth and justification, and privilege. \\
+\\
+**Chief Kathi's Evidence.** \\
+\\
+The first witness called was the Chief Kathi of Selangor, who said that the plaintiff was appointed by him as a religious teacher at Sungei Jendram about five years ago. The witness had the power to appoint from H.H. the Sultan. The first occasion on which he had a doubt as to whether the plaintiff was discharging his duties satisfactorily was on his receiving the petition in December, 1927, and in February he held an inquiry. Twenty-three witnesses were examined. The decision recorded was that there was insufficient evidence to convict the plaintiff and revoke his authority as a teacher. Mr. Ivens pointed out that H.H. the Sultan had appointed a committee to investigate the case, and that as a result the plaintiff was dismissed. In reply to his Lordship, the witness stated that H.H. the Sultan appointed the Raja Muda, the late Dato Stia di Raja, the Raja Haji Abdullah and himself as the committee. In reply to Mr. Mallik the witness said that the decision was that the plaintiff should permitted to continue in his capacity as a teacher for six months. Further evidence was given regarding the difference between Sunni Mohammedans and Wahabis. A Sunni Mohammedan who acted like a "Wahabi,"
+the witness said, would be acting contrary to the religious rules in the country. It would be objectionable for a man to be termed a 'Wahabi' if he belonged to the Sunni sect. Yesterday morning the plaintiff was called and was subjected to examination by Mr. Mallik. The hearing is proceeding."//
+(Sumber: Pinang Gazette and Straits Chronicle, 12 July 1928, Page 7: {{ :akhbar:pinangazette19280712-1-2-35.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/pinangazette19280712-1.2.35|"MALAY LIBEL ACTION"]]).
+//"Judgment Given for the Defendants. ... At the Supreme Court this morning the Chief Justice gave judgment in the famous Guru libel case in which Haji Jalaluddin Ismail (a religious teacher of Jendram, Ulu Langat) sued seven other Malays for publishing an alleged libel against him, claiming $3,200 damages, and prayed for an injunction rest(r)aining the defendants from publishing similar libellous statements. His Lordship (Mr. Justice Gomperty) in the course of a lengthy judgment found for the defendants. The question of costs is to be argued in chambers to-morrow."// (Malaya Tribune, 1 October 1928, Page 8: {{ :akhbar:maltribune19281001-1-2-37.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/maltribune19281001-1.2.37|"GURU LIBEL CASE"]]).
+===== 1929-09-02: Kes Ugut di Jenderam Estate =====
+//"Four Chinese coolies, Cheng Kei, Ong Yew, Chang Kai and Mook Ying were produced by the O.C.P.D., Mantin (Che Abdul Jalil) before the Magistrate on Thursday on a charge that they at Jenderam Estate, Nilai, committed criminal intimidation by threatening to do harm to the Chinese coolies on Jenderam Estate. The O.C.P.D. in
+outlining the case said that the accused were coolies working in Jenderam Estate. They said that the kapala of that estate had not treated them fairly. They instigated the other coolies to stop work. The hearing has been postponed to Wednesday. Bail of $50 each was allowed. "// (Malacca Guardian, 2 September 1929, Page 5: {{ :akhbar:malaccaguardian19290902-1-2-11-12.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/malaccaguardian19290902-1.2.11.12|"SEREMBAN COURT"]]).
+**BERSAMBUNG: [[hulu_1930-an|Kampung Jenderam Hulu: 1930-an]]**.