Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- hulu_1920-an [2025/11/30 07:55] – [1929-09-02: Kes Ugut di Jenderam Estate] sazli
+++ hulu_1920-an [2026/01/26 12:34] (kini) – [Dirujuk oleh] sazli
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ===== Dirujuk oleh =====
-  * [[jenderam_hulu|Kampung Jenderam Hulu (1870-an)]]
+  * [[hulu_1910-an|Kampung Jenderam Hulu: 1910-an]]
+**SAMBUNGAN DARI: [[hulu_1910-an|Kampung Jenderam Hulu: 1910-an]]**.
 ====== Kronologi ======
@@ Line 10: / Line 12: @@
 Arkib Negara 1957/0212978W, 26/10/1920: {{ :arkibgambar:online_finding_aids_-_material_detail_-_280676.pdf ||}}[[https://ofa.arkib.gov.my/ofa/group/asset/280676|"JENDRAM MALAY RESERVATION. EXTENSION OF:"]]).
 ==== Peta 1926 dan 1929 ====
@@ Line 16: / Line 19: @@
 **Kiri**: Peta sekitar rizab Melayu Jenderam (1926). Kawasan rizab melayu ini telah diperluaskan ke seluruh hulu Sungai Jenderam di sebelah selatannya (Malaya Survey Department, 1926 @ University of Minnesota Libraries: {{ :laman:umedia-peta-selangor-1926.pdf ||}}[[https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/item/p16022coll230:3899|"Selangor : Federated Malay States 1926"]]). \\
 **Kanan**: Peta sekitar rizab Melayu Jenderam (1929) (Edward Stanford @ F.M.S. Survey Department, 1929: {{ :laman:selangor_1929._geographicus_rare_antique_maps.pdf ||}}[[https://www.geographicus.com/P/AntiqueMap/selangor-fms-1929|"1929 F.M.S. Wall Map of Selangor (Kuala Lumpur)"]]).
+===== 1921-12-07: Serangan Harimau =====
+//"A Malay boy aged about 15 was taken by a tigress during tapping hours last week from a Malay kampong which borders on the jungle reserve in the Jendaram district says the Malay Mail. Three tapping lots which were adjacent were being tapped by Malay tappers who were all within sight of one another, one of whom was the elder brother of the victim taken. He states that he actually saw the tigress spring from the jungle on to the back of his brother as he was bending down to place his cup, and carry the body swiftly into the jungle. The two remaining tappers raised the alarm and with 'tomtoms' and tins entered the jungle at the point where the tigers had been seen to disappear. At some distance the boy's leg was found and some considerable distance farther the body, with an attempt at concealment beneath the undergrowth. The remains were brought to Kajang for investigation and inquest. It is said that this tigress has been often seen lately accompanied by a acub, and that the male parent had some fame as a man-eater in the district before being dispatched."// (Pinang Gazette and Straits Chronicle, 7 December 1921, Page 5: {{ :akhbar:pinangazette19211207-1-2-31.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/pinangazette19211207-1.2.31|"MAN-EATER AT JENDARAM"]]; The Singapore Free Press and Mercantile Advertiser (1884-1942), 12 December 1921, Page 2: {{ :akhbar:singfreepressb19211212-1-2-7.pdf ||}} [[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singfreepressb19211212-1.2.7|"MAN-EATER AT JENDARAM"]]).
 ===== 1923-01-09: Perpindahan Cikgu Ahmad Abdullah ke Kolej Tanjung Malim =====
@@ Line 109: / Line 116: @@
 //"Judgment Given for the Defendants. ... At the Supreme Court this morning the Chief Justice gave judgment in the famous Guru libel case in which Haji Jalaluddin Ismail (a religious teacher of Jendram, Ulu Langat) sued seven other Malays for publishing an alleged libel against him, claiming $3,200 damages, and prayed for an injunction rest(r)aining the defendants from publishing similar libellous statements. His Lordship (Mr. Justice Gomperty) in the course of a lengthy judgment found for the defendants. The question of costs is to be argued in chambers to-morrow."// (Malaya Tribune, 1 October 1928, Page 8: {{ :akhbar:maltribune19281001-1-2-37.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/maltribune19281001-1.2.37|"GURU LIBEL CASE"]]).
+//"Kuala Lumpur, Octover 1, In the Supreme Court this morning the Chief Justice, Sir Henry Gompertz, gave judgment in the famous Guru libel case in which Haji Jalaluddin bin Ismail (a religious teacher of Jendram, Ulu Langat) sued seven other Malays for publishing a libel against him and claiming $3,200 damages. He also prayed for an injunction restraining the defendants from publishing similar libellous statements. His Lordship in the course of a lengthy judgment found for the defendants. The question of costs is to be argued in chambers to-morrow."// (Pinang Gazette and Straits Chronicle, 2 October 1928, Page 9: {{ :akhbar:pinangazette19281002-1-2-36.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/pinangazette19281002-1.2.36|"GURU LIBEL CASE JUDGMENT"]]).
 ===== 1929-09-02: Kes Ugut di Jenderam Estate =====
@@ Line 114: / Line 123: @@
 //"Four Chinese coolies, Cheng Kei, Ong Yew, Chang Kai and Mook Ying were produced by the O.C.P.D., Mantin (Che Abdul Jalil) before the Magistrate on Thursday on a charge that they at Jenderam Estate, Nilai, committed criminal intimidation by threatening to do harm to the Chinese coolies on Jenderam Estate. The O.C.P.D. in
 outlining the case said that the accused were coolies working in Jenderam Estate. They said that the kapala of that estate had not treated them fairly. They instigated the other coolies to stop work. The hearing has been postponed to Wednesday. Bail of $50 each was allowed. "// (Malacca Guardian, 2 September 1929, Page 5: {{ :akhbar:malaccaguardian19290902-1-2-11-12.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/malaccaguardian19290902-1.2.11.12|"SEREMBAN COURT"]]).
+**BERSAMBUNG: [[hulu_1930-an|Kampung Jenderam Hulu: 1930-an]]**.