| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| hulu_pemusnahan [2026/01/13 18:19] – [1952-03-20: Keadaan Tahanan dan Pampasan Warga] sazli | hulu_pemusnahan [2026/01/13 18:39] (kini) – [1953-01-26: Risalah Berita] sazli |
|---|
| |
| (Sumber: The Straits Times, 23 February 1951, Page 8: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510223-1-2-136.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510223-1.2.136|"Villagers Near Jenderam Flee Their Homes"]]). | (Sumber: The Straits Times, 23 February 1951, Page 8: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510223-1-2-136.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510223-1.2.136|"Villagers Near Jenderam Flee Their Homes"]]). |
| |
| ===== 1951-02-25: Kes-Kes Kecurian Barangan Warga ===== | |
| |
| //"A denial that there was looting during the operation against Jenderam - the Selangor village which became a bandits' lair - was made today by the Kajang district War Executive Committee. The committee admitted, however, that some property had been stolen on the night of Feb. 15/16 following the evacuation, but said that this had occured in the outlying districts and it had been physically impossible to stop it. 'The presence of bandits in the area on that night has been definitely established,' said the committee. The committee said three bicycles and one sewing machine are known to be missing. Answering questions by Sunday Times the Committee said that not a single packet of cigarettes was found in Jenderam. There was, however, a small quantity of Chinese tobacco. A certain amount of beer was held in stock by the village shopkeepers. Some was bought on the spot and paid for by people who took part in the operation. What remained, the committee said, was destroyed because of the difficulty of transporting it to Kajang. There were six cases of 48 tins each and 26 loose tins of condensed milk brought to Kajang. There were six cases of 48 tins each and 26 loose tins of condensed milk brought to Kajang. This, considering the population of Jenderam and the outlying district was not great but the Executive Officer, South Selangor, who was in charge of the operation, said that when he examined the baggage of a number of shopkeepers he found that many of them were carrying tins of milk. In one case he counted 50 tins."// | |
| |
| {{:akhbar:straitstimes19510225-1-2-73-mandur.png?300|Subrayan, a conservancy mandore}} \\ | |
| //"Subrayan, a conservancy mandore, who is making a name for himself as an auctioneer at Kajang. During the sale of goods brought in from the village of Jenderam, Subrayan is chief 'salesman' under the supervision of the Assistant District Officer, Inche Jalal. Here he is seen holding a tin of biscuits, one of a lot of 100 which he sold for more than $300. - Sunday Times picture."// | |
| |
| (Sumber: The Straits Times, 25 February 1951, Page 9: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510225-1-2-73.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510225-1.2.73|"No looting at Jenderam"]]). | |
| ==== 1951-04-03: Padi, Tikar, dan Barangan Dapur ==== | |
| |
| //"Two young Indians, M. Nathan and Sambutram, who were arrested at the deserted village of Jenderam on April 3 with two sacks full of padi, mats and bowls and two frying pans, were at Kajang charged with being unable to account satisfactorily tor the possession of the goods, which were suspected of having been fradulently obtained. The case was postponed to April 17."// (The Straits Times, 12 April 1951, Page 8: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510412-1-2-114.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510412-1.2.114|"Jenderam: two charged"]]). | |
| |
| //"Two young Indian labourers. M. Naitham and Samutram, were yesterday convicted for fraudulently having two | |
| sacks of padi, pieces of matting, bowls and frying pans, and also for being in a prohibited area - Jenderam. | |
| Naitham was sentenced to two months' imprisonment on the first charge and fined $15 on the second charge. Samutram was bound over to be of good behaviour in $200."// (The Straits Times, 20 April 1951, Page 7: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510420-1-2-113.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510420-1.2.113|"THEY WERE IN JENDERAM"]]). | |
| |
| ==== 1951-04-10: Tayar Basikal ==== | |
| |
| //"Alleged thefts from Jenderam during the evacuation of 1,700 under the Emergency Regulations had a sequel at | |
| Kajang when Thillyampalam, a senior Indian hospital attendant with 24 years' service, was acquitted of stealing two bicycle tyres. The Magistrate, Inche Harun, said he felt that all the ambulance men were implicated. "I do not understand why the whole lot of them were not charged." he added. Evidence was given that several articles were found in an ambulance which had gone to Jenderam to remove the sick and aged. After hearing five prosecution witnesses, the magistrate said that unless the four stretcher-bearers, two hospital attendants, and two policemen were all charged, he was not prepared to convict one man. All the men connected with the ambulance denied stealing the articles. Thillyampalam who was represented by Mr. Robert Chelliah was acquitted and discharged. The court was told that the ambulance made a number or trips from Jenderam to Kajang. Mr. Deval. A.S.P. and Police Lieut. Porthouse, said they saw Thillyampalam coming out of a shop in Jenderam carrying two bicycle tyres. Suspecting that he had stolen the tyres. they searched the ambulance and found two ducks and a basket full of household utensils."// (The Straits Times, 10 April 1951, Page 4: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510410-1-2-59.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510410-1.2.59|"Bench frees 1, says 8 guilty"]]). | |
| |
| //"The Kajang District War Executive Committee today admitted that there were three reports of theft made during the evacuation of 1,500 residents of Jenderam, but maintained that there was no looting at the time. In a statement, the committee stated that the recent trial of a senior dresser of the Kajang Government Hospital was an individual instance where a charge of theft had been brought. There were two other cases reported which were now under consideration. 'Looting,' the committee stated, 'legally implies the widespread removal of goods by all and sundry. The case reported in Tuesday's Straits Times was an individual case of theft.' \\ | |
| \\ | |
| At the trial, the magistrate had stated that he was not prepared to continue with the case because he could not understand why the other occupants of the ambulance in which the dresser was riding had not been charged with him. The War Executive Committee today stated the question of whether the other occupants of the ambulance would be charged was now under consideration by Federation Police headquarters in Kuala Lumpur. \\ | |
| \\ | |
| FOOTNOTE: The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines 'loot' as 'goods taken from enemy, spoil, booty, illicit gains made by officials.'"// | |
| |
| (Sumber: The Straits Times, 14 April 1951, Page 4: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510414-1-2-57.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510414-1.2.57|"JENDERAM 3 THEFTS, BUT NO LOOTING"]]). | |
| |
| ===== 1951-02-28: Perdebatan di Akhbar Guardian UK ===== | ===== 1951-02-28: Perdebatan di Akhbar Guardian UK ===== |
| |
| //"Labour critics have entirely overlooked the cases of Pusing and Jenderam, to mention only two occasions on which drastic action was approved by the Labour Government certainly on no better grounds than Tanjong Malim. Jenderam was razed, and its inhabitants motored off to detention camps where they were held for several months until a long process of interrogation was completed. And Jenderam had become what it was mainly because the authorities had not taken sufficient precautions despite the pleas of villagers in the district who had many times urged the Government to do something. There had also been Government negligence in the case of Pusing, a township which was fined and put under strict curfew. But no Labour Peer or M.P. protested."// (The Straits Times, 9 April 1952, Page 6: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19520409-1-2-90.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19520409-1.2.90|"The Sport Of Party"]]). | //"Labour critics have entirely overlooked the cases of Pusing and Jenderam, to mention only two occasions on which drastic action was approved by the Labour Government certainly on no better grounds than Tanjong Malim. Jenderam was razed, and its inhabitants motored off to detention camps where they were held for several months until a long process of interrogation was completed. And Jenderam had become what it was mainly because the authorities had not taken sufficient precautions despite the pleas of villagers in the district who had many times urged the Government to do something. There had also been Government negligence in the case of Pusing, a township which was fined and put under strict curfew. But no Labour Peer or M.P. protested."// (The Straits Times, 9 April 1952, Page 6: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19520409-1-2-90.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19520409-1.2.90|"The Sport Of Party"]]). |
| | |
| | ===== 1952-09-27: Pencerobohan ===== |
| | |
| | //"For entering Jenderam, a controlled area, without a permit, Kok Koon Chuan and Choo Ah Yen were each fined $20 by Raja Suleiman, Circuit Magistrate, Sepang, on Saturday."// (Singapore Standard, 30 September 1952, Page 5: {{ :akhbar:singstandard19520930-1-2-64.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singstandard19520930-1.2.64|"2 Had No Permit"]]). |
| |
| ===== 1953-01-26: Risalah Berita ===== | ===== 1953-01-26: Risalah Berita ===== |
| //"With regard to Jenderam Village, Inche Aziz asked whether Government would consider re-opening the village to its former inhabitants in view of the improved Emergency situation in that area. Mr. Humphrey replied that the possibility of permitting some of its former inhabitants to return to Jenderam is being considered."// (Singapore Standard, 7 May 1953, Page 5: {{ :akhbar:singstandard19530507-1-2-94-1.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singstandard19530507-1.2.94.1|"SAME LAWS FOR ALL DETAINEES"]]). | //"With regard to Jenderam Village, Inche Aziz asked whether Government would consider re-opening the village to its former inhabitants in view of the improved Emergency situation in that area. Mr. Humphrey replied that the possibility of permitting some of its former inhabitants to return to Jenderam is being considered."// (Singapore Standard, 7 May 1953, Page 5: {{ :akhbar:singstandard19530507-1-2-94-1.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singstandard19530507-1.2.94.1|"SAME LAWS FOR ALL DETAINEES"]]). |
| |
| ===== 1951-1955: Proses Pampasan Warga ===== | ===== 1951-1955: Tuntutan dan Pampasan Warga ===== |
| |
| ===== 1951-02-20: Lelongan Barangan Warga ===== | ==== 1951-02-20: Lelongan Barangan Warga ==== |
| |
| //"The empty shell of Jenderam, the Selangor village which became a bandit lair, will go in flames in about five weeks. Until then it is to be stripped of everything useful and saleable. Anything that can be sold will be auctioned and the money divided among its 1,500 inhabitants. The livestock from the village, brought to Kuala Lumpur at the end of last week, was sold at the week-end. Today the Queen's Cinema, Kajang, not in use for two uears, was converted into an elaborate provision market. Tin provisions, Chinese sauce, peas and beans, meehoon and coconut oil, which had been brought down to Kajang from Jenderam, were auctioned."// (The Straits Times, 20 February 1951, Page 1: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510220-1-2-13.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510220-1.2.13|"Jenderam: What's Left Is Sold"]]). | //"The empty shell of Jenderam, the Selangor village which became a bandit lair, will go in flames in about five weeks. Until then it is to be stripped of everything useful and saleable. Anything that can be sold will be auctioned and the money divided among its 1,500 inhabitants. The livestock from the village, brought to Kuala Lumpur at the end of last week, was sold at the week-end. Today the Queen's Cinema, Kajang, not in use for two uears, was converted into an elaborate provision market. Tin provisions, Chinese sauce, peas and beans, meehoon and coconut oil, which had been brought down to Kajang from Jenderam, were auctioned."// (The Straits Times, 20 February 1951, Page 1: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510220-1-2-13.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510220-1.2.13|"Jenderam: What's Left Is Sold"]]). |
| |
| ==== 1952-03-20: Keadaan Tahanan dan Pampasan Warga ==== | ==== 1951-02-25: Kes-Kes Kecurian Barangan Warga ==== |
| | |
| | //"A denial that there was looting during the operation against Jenderam - the Selangor village which became a bandits' lair - was made today by the Kajang district War Executive Committee. The committee admitted, however, that some property had been stolen on the night of Feb. 15/16 following the evacuation, but said that this had occured in the outlying districts and it had been physically impossible to stop it. 'The presence of bandits in the area on that night has been definitely established,' said the committee. The committee said three bicycles and one sewing machine are known to be missing. Answering questions by Sunday Times the Committee said that not a single packet of cigarettes was found in Jenderam. There was, however, a small quantity of Chinese tobacco. A certain amount of beer was held in stock by the village shopkeepers. Some was bought on the spot and paid for by people who took part in the operation. What remained, the committee said, was destroyed because of the difficulty of transporting it to Kajang. There were six cases of 48 tins each and 26 loose tins of condensed milk brought to Kajang. There were six cases of 48 tins each and 26 loose tins of condensed milk brought to Kajang. This, considering the population of Jenderam and the outlying district was not great but the Executive Officer, South Selangor, who was in charge of the operation, said that when he examined the baggage of a number of shopkeepers he found that many of them were carrying tins of milk. In one case he counted 50 tins."// |
| | |
| | {{:akhbar:straitstimes19510225-1-2-73-mandur.png?300|Subrayan, a conservancy mandore}} \\ |
| | //"Subrayan, a conservancy mandore, who is making a name for himself as an auctioneer at Kajang. During the sale of goods brought in from the village of Jenderam, Subrayan is chief 'salesman' under the supervision of the Assistant District Officer, Inche Jalal. Here he is seen holding a tin of biscuits, one of a lot of 100 which he sold for more than $300. - Sunday Times picture."// |
| | |
| | (Sumber: The Straits Times, 25 February 1951, Page 9: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510225-1-2-73.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510225-1.2.73|"No looting at Jenderam"]]). |
| | |
| | === 1951-04-03: Padi, Tikar, dan Barangan Dapur === |
| | |
| | //"Two young Indians, M. Nathan and Sambutram, who were arrested at the deserted village of Jenderam on April 3 with two sacks full of padi, mats and bowls and two frying pans, were at Kajang charged with being unable to account satisfactorily tor the possession of the goods, which were suspected of having been fradulently obtained. The case was postponed to April 17."// (The Straits Times, 12 April 1951, Page 8: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510412-1-2-114.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510412-1.2.114|"Jenderam: two charged"]]). |
| | |
| | //"Two young Indian labourers. M. Naitham and Samutram, were yesterday convicted for fraudulently having two |
| | sacks of padi, pieces of matting, bowls and frying pans, and also for being in a prohibited area - Jenderam. |
| | Naitham was sentenced to two months' imprisonment on the first charge and fined $15 on the second charge. Samutram was bound over to be of good behaviour in $200."// (The Straits Times, 20 April 1951, Page 7: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510420-1-2-113.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510420-1.2.113|"THEY WERE IN JENDERAM"]]). |
| | |
| | === 1951-04-10: Tayar Basikal === |
| | |
| | //"Alleged thefts from Jenderam during the evacuation of 1,700 under the Emergency Regulations had a sequel at |
| | Kajang when Thillyampalam, a senior Indian hospital attendant with 24 years' service, was acquitted of stealing two bicycle tyres. The Magistrate, Inche Harun, said he felt that all the ambulance men were implicated. "I do not understand why the whole lot of them were not charged." he added. Evidence was given that several articles were found in an ambulance which had gone to Jenderam to remove the sick and aged. After hearing five prosecution witnesses, the magistrate said that unless the four stretcher-bearers, two hospital attendants, and two policemen were all charged, he was not prepared to convict one man. All the men connected with the ambulance denied stealing the articles. Thillyampalam who was represented by Mr. Robert Chelliah was acquitted and discharged. The court was told that the ambulance made a number or trips from Jenderam to Kajang. Mr. Deval. A.S.P. and Police Lieut. Porthouse, said they saw Thillyampalam coming out of a shop in Jenderam carrying two bicycle tyres. Suspecting that he had stolen the tyres. they searched the ambulance and found two ducks and a basket full of household utensils."// (The Straits Times, 10 April 1951, Page 4: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510410-1-2-59.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510410-1.2.59|"Bench frees 1, says 8 guilty"]]). |
| | |
| | //"The Kajang District War Executive Committee today admitted that there were three reports of theft made during the evacuation of 1,500 residents of Jenderam, but maintained that there was no looting at the time. In a statement, the committee stated that the recent trial of a senior dresser of the Kajang Government Hospital was an individual instance where a charge of theft had been brought. There were two other cases reported which were now under consideration. 'Looting,' the committee stated, 'legally implies the widespread removal of goods by all and sundry. The case reported in Tuesday's Straits Times was an individual case of theft.' \\ |
| | \\ |
| | At the trial, the magistrate had stated that he was not prepared to continue with the case because he could not understand why the other occupants of the ambulance in which the dresser was riding had not been charged with him. The War Executive Committee today stated the question of whether the other occupants of the ambulance would be charged was now under consideration by Federation Police headquarters in Kuala Lumpur. \\ |
| | \\ |
| | FOOTNOTE: The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines 'loot' as 'goods taken from enemy, spoil, booty, illicit gains made by officials.'"// |
| | |
| | (Sumber: The Straits Times, 14 April 1951, Page 4: {{ :akhbar:straitstimes19510414-1-2-57.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19510414-1.2.57|"JENDERAM 3 THEFTS, BUT NO LOOTING"]]). |
| | |
| | ==== 1951-12-13: Proses Tuntutan Hasil Jualan Barangan Warga ===== |
| | |
| | //"Steps are being taken to refund the proceeds of the sale of the belongings of detainees in Jenderam. A committee to investigate all claims made for refund has been formed and further action awaits the result of deliberation of the committee. This statement was made in the State Council today in answer to a question by Mr. Leung Cheung Ling."// (Singapore Standard, 13 December 1951, Page 4: {{ :akhbar:singstandard19511213-1-2-53.pdf ||}}[[https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singstandard19511213-1.2.53|"REFUND OF PROCEEDS"]]). |
| | |
| | ==== 1952-03-20: Perkembangan Tahanan serta Tuntutan Hasil Jualan ==== |
| |
| //"The latest position of detainees removed from Jenderam on Feb 15 last year was explained by Mr. E.B. David, Secretary for Defence, when he answered a series of questions put to him by Enche Abdul Aziz. Mr. David said that of the 1,609 persons detained 1,347 have been released. Sufficient evidence was forthcoming against 194 of these persons, namely 157 Malays and Indonesians and 37 Chinese to warrant the making of individual orders of detention. These 194 persons have in detention with them 68 dependent children in the Kluang Detention Camp. The Malays and Indonesians who have been released have not been resettled. They were allowed to join their relatives in various parts of the State except in South Selangor. A few have joined their relatives outside the State. None of them wished to be resettled. \\ | //"The latest position of detainees removed from Jenderam on Feb 15 last year was explained by Mr. E.B. David, Secretary for Defence, when he answered a series of questions put to him by Enche Abdul Aziz. Mr. David said that of the 1,609 persons detained 1,347 have been released. Sufficient evidence was forthcoming against 194 of these persons, namely 157 Malays and Indonesians and 37 Chinese to warrant the making of individual orders of detention. These 194 persons have in detention with them 68 dependent children in the Kluang Detention Camp. The Malays and Indonesians who have been released have not been resettled. They were allowed to join their relatives in various parts of the State except in South Selangor. A few have joined their relatives outside the State. None of them wished to be resettled. \\ |
